Highlights from the EPA v Maules Creek Coal blast fume prosecutions

A succession of witnesses has appeared before the Justice Richard Beasley of the NSW Land and Environment Court in the prosecution of Maules Creek Coal mine for a series of 8 breaches of its Environmental Protection Licence. The charges arose after the Whitehaven Coal-owned mine caused dangerous levels of orange, red and purple nitrogen dioxide … Read more

Why NWPA is challenging the APLNG/Origin Energy Ironbark Project

An Origin Energy gas well in Condamine State Forest

North West Protection Advocacy (NWPA) has lodged an Internal Review Application against the Queensland Government’s approval of the Ironbark gas expansion project under Environmental Authority EPPG00968013. Our original submission can be read here. The approval allows: After reviewing the approval documents, scientific literature and government reports, NWPA believes the decision raises serious concerns about groundwater, … Read more

Livestream the Whitehaven Fume Prosecutions — Trial Opens Wednesday 29 April

A blast above the Whitehaven Coal Mine

After years of delay, legal manoeuvring, and failed attempts to shut the case down, the prosecution in Environmental Protection Authority v Maules Creek Coal Pty Ltd will finally open this Wednesday (29th April 2026) at 2:00 PM in Court 5B of the NSW Land and Environment Court. (Feature image courtesy of a Whitehaven Coal worker). … Read more

Submission on EA Amendment – Ironbark (EPPG00968013) – Origin Energy

A coal seam gas wastewater pond or dam Origin Ironbark Submission PL1106

This submission (see below for copy) is made in relation to the proposed amendment to Environmental Authority EPPG00968013 (Ironbark) (the “EA”), including activities proposed within PL1106. The submission is made under the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (Qld) (EP Act) and is confined to matters relevant to the EA amendment decision, including the adequacy of information … Read more

Queensland’s next deep unconventional ‘oil and gas’ phase (with fracking)

Cattle cross a gas pipeline as a gas drill rig looms in the background

Over the past year, the Queensland Government has promoted new exploration acreage and highlighted the economic potential of deeper onshore petroleum development, including in the Taroom Trough. At the same time, there has been a noticeable increase in applications to amend existing Environmental Authorities (EAs) to include hydraulic fracture stimulation (HFS), disposal of drilling residuals, … Read more

Santos Ramps up the Pressure on #PilligaPipeline

Traditional Owners and Knitting Nannas in the Pilliga Forest with placards

For the 2nd year in a row community has been asked to respond at the busiest time of year to over 1,000 pages of documentation for the Narrabri Lateral Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This timing seems a deliberate tactic by Santos to decrease meaningful engagement and evade thorough scrutiny. Quite frankly, after fifteen+ years of … Read more

Santos’ Narrabri Lateral Pipeline Survey – where coal & gas collide

A group of people at Pilliga Pipeline exit point at Smithers Gate

Santos’ contractors, Anderson Environmental & Planning (AEP) of Newcastle, have been conducting “scouting, sampling and survey” work inside the Pilliga Forest under a Forest Permit issued by NSW Forestry Corporation for the Narrabri Lateral Pipeline Survey. The permit—clearly visible on a contractor’s vehicle parked at Smithers Gate, the eastern entry to the forest—appears linked to … Read more

Unraveling the Santos MOU Spin Cycle

Santos and Narrabri Council have signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the supply of coal seam gas. The Media Release from Santos is chock-a-block full of spin, codewords and obfuscations – we’ve decoded it in this series of graphics and asked some important questions. At the time this agreement was signed, Santos was … Read more

Santos’ toxic tank disappears without a trace

In March 2024, GasWatch monitors reported health symptoms near the Dewhurst 28 CSG well, linked to a break tank emitting toxic gases, including Hydrogen Sulphide. Despite complaints to the EPA and monitoring efforts, inadequate regulatory responses and transparency issues were exposed. Calls for continuous monitoring and better regulations have intensified.