Images

NWPAFollow

Correction: Santos $STO says Narrabri Gas has only 5% CO2 but 1,000 data sets reveal average is 25%~ possibly up to 30%. STO wouldn’t let IESC view the data they relied on. https://www.michaelwest.com.au/battle-for-narrabri-report-claims-santos-gas-field-emissions-approach-coal/

Narrabri Coal & Gas Pollution@leardzone

@ChristineMilne @spottedquoll @NSW_EPA @MichaelWestBiz And this from revealing Santos $STO Chairman Spence repeating the unreliable and disputed claims that Narrabri has is up to 25% UNSALEABLE CO2! From @NWPAdvocacy https://nwprotectionadvocacy.com/santos-annual-general-meeting-statements-open-up-new-doubts-about-narrabri-gas-eis-disclosures/

Reply on Twitter 1380429074284175361 Retweet on Twitter 13804290742841753614 Like on Twitter 13804290742841753614 Twitter 1380429074284175361

NWPA @NWPAdvocacy·

9 Apr

.@NSWDPIE has produced Data Packages for all #FarWestNSW target plays including a review of structure, geology, basin evolution, history of exploration, & analysis of petroleum systems, the packages cost $70 ea. How many have been sold? Cost to produce?
https://nwprotectionadvocacy.com/nsw-government-mobilises-plans-to-frack-for-gas-in-western-nsw/

Reply on Twitter 1380373819857137668 Retweet on Twitter 13803738198571376682 Like on Twitter 13803738198571376682 Twitter 1380373819857137668

Bett Plan Network @BettPlanNetwork·

8 Apr

**DEADLINE to participate in the Preliminary Regional Issues Assessment of tights sands FRACKING in Far West NSW. This is the scoping stage for #gas expansion. You can provide feedback until midnight on Friday 9 April by completing the form available here-https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1yRXY8-jwIg2-G1DWwTkosa4W3Pyvkp9Ds9wP8KjNK6Q/viewform?edit_requested=true

Reply on Twitter 1380111537277313024 Retweet on Twitter 13801115372773130242 Like on Twitter 13801115372773130243 Twitter 1380111537277313024

Justine Bucknell @djbuck99·

8 Apr

Below is the "Independent Peer Review" of the modelling used for the Macquarie Valley Floodplain Harvesting implementation.
How anyone can 'peer review' when they are conveniently not supplied with the detailed modelling data is staggering.
https://www.industry.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/357956/final-summary.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1380019947284230146 Retweet on Twitter 138001994728423014613 Like on Twitter 138001994728423014619 Twitter 1380019947284230146

Gerg @Gergyl·

23 Mar

Shall we put the upstream and downstream Cubbie Station gauges beside each other, and watch what happens? #Baaka flow.

(Why tf shouldn't we look? This is public water flowing down a public river.)

https://water-monitoring.information.qld.gov.au/

Reply on Twitter 1374241774454013956 Retweet on Twitter 137424177445401395680 Like on Twitter 1374241774454013956105 Twitter 1374241774454013956

Archives